InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lastchoice

12/04/07 1:04 PM

#198913 RE: revlis #198912

anything to start another arb, they can then appeal, and appeal the appeal...

sdny judge was definitely onto that scheme with sammy!
icon url

loophole73

12/04/07 1:09 PM

#198914 RE: revlis #198912

how foolish

Nok is entitled to a royalty free license. Oh really, the first question I would ask the Nok representative is how many royalty free licenses have they given to others.

MO
loop
icon url

hotncold

12/05/07 7:00 AM

#199096 RE: revlis #198912

NOK are probably arguing that the '579 patent is covered under the TDD paid up license. They know it isn't but they are hoping that they can make enough noise for the question to be considered under the arbitration clause. Once it's under arbitration, the ITC proceedings will be stayed.