Replies to post #27173 on Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[dougSF30]

sgolds, keep your personal attacks to yourself. From where, exactly, do you imagine your authority to regulate content across multiple venues derives?

And please make a habit of reading through the full thread before posting.

The simple meaning??

"Quite a different beast" and "no, not at this point" when asked if clarification was possible, and *that's* your analysis of the meaning? I'm starting to understand your bear market predictions.

Doug

[ChrisC_R]

Sgolds, re.: "Doug, give it up, please. Can't Keith make a simple statement without you spinning it into occult knowlege across several boards?"

With Keith's industry insight (inside?) I took it to be more than just evolutionary improvements. I speculated he had learned of something like a dual core product coming, which would be really exciting.

Maybe even a hint that 90 nm on SOI gives significant speed benefits? (Of course, Keith is on record as stating that there will be no 90nm A64 product in Q3. Any change there?)

However, I wouldn't presume to push for too much more on a public forum.......

[KeithDust2000]

sgolds, exactly, highly annoying indeed (eom)

[kpf]

sgolds

"(but it might make some dandy flash)."

As long it is floating gate products, there is nothing to worry for FASL, which plans to be at 110nm Mirrorbit few months later than Intel plans to be ramping 90nm floating gate (same wafer size). K.