InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

GoldenStar

11/11/07 11:26 AM

#198 RE: TruckerChris #197

TruckerChris

"I think AERO had great potential, until it became involved with FCCN."

I agree, Performance product manufacturers can do well if the product does what it was advertised to do, I do not think the Aero Product lives up to its advertisements right now but that does not mean they could not build on that product and make it better, but now with the Peacock involved it seems the focus is selling shares instead of providing a good product, its almost as if the Aero folks were giving up and this is a farewell party in which they are cashing in on as they exit.

I don't think Rusty Wallace has any idea what is going on here but my guess is that once he finds out you wont see his name along side anymore Aero products.


icon url

LoanStew

11/11/07 11:45 AM

#199 RE: TruckerChris #197

TruckerChris,
" Also, if FCCN or Aero can break .10 with solid profits without dilution, I will return and ride it up from there."

If the above situation does happen, I believe you'll be able to make good money going up, even at .10.

IMO/FWIW
icon url

EarnestDD

11/11/07 1:14 PM

#200 RE: TruckerChris #197

Somewhere along the line ... someone sold Aero with the idea that advertising with Nascar was the way to go.
So they sponsored a car and hired Rusty.
Obviously ... being a little company .. they did not have the staying power it takes to be involved in Nascar.
It was a very expensive lesson for Aero.
It is also the reason that the Miller Trust sued and was named on the patent as an assignee.