InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fourkids_9pets

11/08/07 3:15 PM

#103212 RE: GamblerNC #103211

nice post gambler

and i very much agree

real company
real products
real inventors
real patents
real management
real business plan
real acquisition
real spokesman
real brand recognition
real sales <even if it's just via *word of mouth*>

looking forward to what the coming pr's highlight

glty
---
4kids
all jmo
icon url

cruzdelsur

11/08/07 3:16 PM

#103213 RE: GamblerNC #103211

I am glad I have shares at PRE-IPO prices .
icon url

walknmannv

11/08/07 3:34 PM

#103215 RE: GamblerNC #103211

Gambler, great post as always. You add depth to the discussion. Auto engineering has been a hobby study all my life (and I am VERY old) so I have familiarization with the technicalities of engines and exhaust systems. I do know what Boyd Butler brought to NASCAR (crossover headers and oval pipes for better ground clearance for two things) and I have spent some time this week reading the patent information from him and from others. Boyd Butler knows exhaust engineering thoroughly and knows practically what can be done and why and how.

Many of us think that this acquisition of Dr Gas will be serendipitous for both companies. Aero can run the day to day operations and sales and that will free Mr Butler to advise them on technicalities and also to allow him to represent both companies to NASCAR and to truck mfrs and modifiers. When Boyd Butler talks, everyone listens.

This is a great alliance which will increase sales for Aero and DR Gas as well. More sales means more advertising dollars. For both. The pps is down but I am not, neither are a lot of other investors who see clearly where Aero is going. We know what we have, as is often said by a fine lady poster here.
Walk
icon url

LoanStew

11/08/07 7:54 PM

#103256 RE: GamblerNC #103211

Gambler,
Let's forget about the LOI, because the LOI is not a deal until we see the filing that shows it is.
1.FCCN was a money-losing enterprise.
2.FCCN acquired Aero through a reverse merger.
3.Aero is a money-losing enterprise.
4.FCCN tripled its total sharecount (give or take) to acquire Aero, a money-losing enterprise.
5.There is no guarantee that Dr. Gas is going to be acquired by FCCN/Aero.
6.There is no guarantee that Dr. Gas is a profitable venture. Further, there is no guarantee on exactly what they're bringing in for sales, since there are no public financials at this time.
7.There is no guarantee that FCCN/Aero has the resources to actually acquire Dr. Gas, or do so without a severe reverse split.
8.The history of Javelin Advisory Group does not bode well for any potential acquisition target, or at the least for the shareholders prior to their involvement.

Right now all there is to discuss is Aero and FCCN, two groups merged into one, who are proficient at losing money and have tied up almost 2 billion shares in a market without a cent of profit.
That's the way I see it.
IMO/FWIW