InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

makesumgravy

11/02/07 3:16 PM

#31929 RE: righty #31928

Good work righty........this means that the mine referred to in the PR is not the Maynard Topez mine sounds like. Does this mean that Berman is owner of the Topez mine whose permit they are revoking?........if this was the background of the mine he was in fact referring to. I would think that this would bring about some real down to earth questions from the regulators.

How much time or even how many trips do you honestly think Berman has even given this........sounds like he doesn't even know what he is talking about most of the time. I bet he can tell you how much money he took in today and how many shares he has left to sell with pinpoint accuracy.
icon url

fazoolius

11/02/07 3:17 PM

#31931 RE: righty #31928

Nice job righty, guess she got to your response before mine. Well that clears things up. The only question is how in the heck did they get this confused with the Maynard Topaz Mine? I am very curious to see the contract that Aware is referring to. Also, I am wondering if that document is not going to be posted on the website, why Aware has it?

Glad to know we are just talking about 30 miles instead of 300.

-faz