InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fazoolius

11/02/07 9:39 AM

#31853 RE: TekNuLoof #31850

Loof,

See, I do have a problem with the wording rather than the poor spelling. This statement is not entirely accurate:

"The Contract will allow Russell Industries to remove approximately 560 tons of material containing Uranium from the Maynard Topaz Mine"

This statement would suggest that RSDS actually has a mine that is producing ore. If this 560 tons is in fact a pile of tailings that was found, then the statement is false unless they can prove that the Uranium did in fact come from the Maynard Topaz Mine.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=24198145


All Berman would need to do is give the operational plans for each of the claim groups and some more info about where they are and what the future for them is. NI 43-101 reports will hopefully shed some light, but I am not certain that we will get them in Q4 as was originally PR'd.

Keeping my fingers crossed.

Looks like there is still some interest in RSDS this morning. That is not too bad at all. Is that just me or is the ASK actually having some sign of life at .0002?

-faz
icon url

righty

11/02/07 10:35 AM

#31859 RE: TekNuLoof #31850

beautiful post loof, I couldnt agree more