InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1604
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/23/2006

Re: TekNuLoof post# 31850

Friday, 11/02/2007 9:39:51 AM

Friday, November 02, 2007 9:39:51 AM

Post# of 44848
Loof,

See, I do have a problem with the wording rather than the poor spelling. This statement is not entirely accurate:

"The Contract will allow Russell Industries to remove approximately 560 tons of material containing Uranium from the Maynard Topaz Mine"

This statement would suggest that RSDS actually has a mine that is producing ore. If this 560 tons is in fact a pile of tailings that was found, then the statement is false unless they can prove that the Uranium did in fact come from the Maynard Topaz Mine.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=24198145


All Berman would need to do is give the operational plans for each of the claim groups and some more info about where they are and what the future for them is. NI 43-101 reports will hopefully shed some light, but I am not certain that we will get them in Q4 as was originally PR'd.

Keeping my fingers crossed.

Looks like there is still some interest in RSDS this morning. That is not too bad at all. Is that just me or is the ASK actually having some sign of life at .0002?

-faz



"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine." - John Galt