![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, November 02, 2007 9:39:51 AM
See, I do have a problem with the wording rather than the poor spelling. This statement is not entirely accurate:
"The Contract will allow Russell Industries to remove approximately 560 tons of material containing Uranium from the Maynard Topaz Mine"
This statement would suggest that RSDS actually has a mine that is producing ore. If this 560 tons is in fact a pile of tailings that was found, then the statement is false unless they can prove that the Uranium did in fact come from the Maynard Topaz Mine.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=24198145
All Berman would need to do is give the operational plans for each of the claim groups and some more info about where they are and what the future for them is. NI 43-101 reports will hopefully shed some light, but I am not certain that we will get them in Q4 as was originally PR'd.
Keeping my fingers crossed.
Looks like there is still some interest in RSDS this morning. That is not too bad at all. Is that just me or is the ASK actually having some sign of life at .0002?
-faz
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM