Huh? How can they possibly ask for shareholder contributions of $200 when they already stated one of their main priorities was to compensate the previous anonymous donors. The new contributors may just end up helping to finance the ongoing legal work, etc. and receive nothing back in return, while the anonymous financiers have at least a promise of a return if any money is recover.
Does anyone have access to the post on the 86 board to confirm this or not? TIA