InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tampa123

02/10/04 9:56 AM

#29515 RE: zen 88 #29512

zen - I did see that post, and hope that Wave can find ways to PR what is apparently a back-office relationship with all of these OEMs. That's really the issue here. It's not that Wave isn't all over the place (in all of our opinions), it's that Wave is "silently" all over the place. These kinds of behind-the-curtains relationships usually yield long-term profitability if/when all goes well. But, if things don't go well, we'll likely never hear of it. And, even if things do go very well under these kinds of relationships, we won't hear about its connections to Wave until everyone else is done at the table first.

This makes for a very, very long wait just to see our share price go back up to betwen $5 - $10 shr. I believe that's truely the rub here. Not that Wave isn't ~ it's when will they finally show up in ways that impact shareholder value.

I hope they figure it out, because it doesn't have to wait until you have $50 million in revenues before the truth comes out.

T123
icon url

go-kitesurf

02/10/04 10:22 AM

#29516 RE: zen 88 #29512

zen, no offense, but Wave is not specifically listed in any of the sessions by name (of course). I get your drift though. The sessions are all describing what Wave is enabling, or has been trying to enable. Just don't want people to get the wrong idea. So I'm gathering that if Wave were present, they would probably be present at room 2007 helping explain this concept and lead/train attendees to implementation.