Again NO -- I think you're stretching with your statements. This is a standardized protocol. You cannot use language such as 'any piece of equipment anywhere on the planet' and 'all of it's activity' to try to say anything meaningful here about FOLO.
That kind of terminology implicitly suggests that there are no standards required, which is the opposite of what FOLO's architecture is based upon. There is a huge difference between "anything and anywhere" versus "anything that is properly designed to fit within the protocol and appropriately adapted to function according to the interfacing standards." You are using very abstract and somewhat ambiguous statements that need to be much more qualified.
YES - the principles within the design are that the software provides the opportunity for establishing compatibility; but, the devil will be in the details when it comes to trying to extend that to say anything and anywhere.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
