NO -- I don't read that into this by any stretch. What the schema for FOLO shows is that there is an architecture and protocols that can be "called" and used for connection and communication or interaction within the system. The FOLO system's architecture provides a secure and standardized base that allows all functions to "engage" both with other data, and, if applicable, within any other components of the overall system so that their software add-ons (or software and hardware) can become interactively part of the overall system. It is an extension means similar to plug-and-play technology within Windows.
For example, let's consider how it might allow the system to adopt and adapt to assumed new technologies. If you assume that someone provided topographic information from a source that was accessible to the system, and that someone else had algorithms in a software application that could provide a driver with guidelines for shifting and speed efficiency decisions, maybe even based on load, engine, weather, plus topographic positions from an interactive map, then FOLO provides a standarized protocol as a means so that those capabilities could be combined and have the necessary I/O for their functionality to be engaged and the results delivered.