InvestorsHub Logo

Gbathat

09/26/07 10:22 AM

#29499 RE: Jenny_Garner #29498

balancing risk

jmo

gbathat

Wildman-j

09/26/07 10:23 AM

#29500 RE: Jenny_Garner #29498

So Jenny - you're calling Paul a liar?

He has specifically pointed out (in an email posted to this board [Wing,Allie - link please?]) that there are investors injecting millions into the company.

ThSeeker

09/26/07 10:32 AM

#29503 RE: Jenny_Garner #29498

JENNY For reasons explained in Paul's note Spooz cannot trade SWARM and do business with their other tools without conflicts with customers etc. So we would not use the tool under SPZI. To get around that we license SWARM in a company that we have a large share of ownership (120 mill shares).
This way we can profit from SWARM and still license it out ro other companies etc. So the choice was not use SWARM for profit within the company or shelf it ( make no money) or work a deal with substantial kickback (share in ownership) with 141. So we are not giving away we are gaining value. For this to make sense you 1st have to accept that the ground rule is that SPOOZ cannot trade with the tool themselves due to complications of conflict with spooztool customers. This point is the one you seem unable to accept.