Replies to post #29115 on SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[bucksmypup]

It just appears that many dont like the looks of this latest development. sponsorship of a company owned by the CEO and board of spzi. I think many smell a rat here. I M hoping for the best and I just hope that Paul does not have only his best interest at hand here. I believe today's PR simply brought up more questions then it answered and FOLKS are a bit nervous. I suppose it will take more info and some time to digest whats going on here. I just hope we have some PR's that directly say SPZI and its shareholders are the MAJOR BENEFACTOR then us sponsoring company 141 and pauls companys. Thats my take on today. I want specific SPZI results not our money helping his company. 120 million shares might only be 10 percect of this compnay but it could be only 1 percent. WE have no answers. Pauls help us out with what this all means.

[ITGuy]

No Stratey, Paul communicated through MNM because he e-mailed him. Of course Paul will answer questions to any shareholder that e-mails him - MNM was just the first to post his response. The PR gives the general idea of the news but there is always more detail to be had with news like this. This is just one way of doing it. How can he answer all questions from all shareholders through a single PR? It needs to be on a first-ask first-answer basis and e-mail provides that route. Paul could choose not to answer any e-mails like some other companies but we know Paul is not like that.

We all wish PRs gave every single detail out necessary to understand the implications of it - it just doesn't happen. At least we get some answers this way.

[moneynmetals]

OK stratey:

Let's go through your points.

1."I know you're going to think, "Here he goes again", but I have much more faith in this stock than I did the other one."

Time will tell.

2. "1. Is the company out of shares (from A/S) to sell? Is this just another way to get more $$?"

Don't know.

3a. " I get very concerned when the CEO of a company finds it necessary to communicate directly with an individual shareholder."

Please explain to me, why this bothers you so much? I sent an email, he sent a responce. This came after todays PR.

My question was, will we see PR's on a more regular basis.


3b. I've always been told that if the CEO is talking to shareholders outside of PRs or SH meetings, that's a BAD sign. Why is he doing that?"

Bad sign you say???? You are enitiled to your opinion.

4. " I am, though, excited about the news today.".

LOL.

Respects
MNM