InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SFGiants

09/14/07 9:43 PM

#42826 RE: silicon valley au #42824

empty shell should = .000000......empty shell with potential should equal .03-.08...empty shell turned full shell with SWVC in the drivers seat with wisebuys and hackets and GSargifuels as backup =.15++++...SWVC with continued growth =$1.00++
icon url

lowtrade

09/14/07 10:00 PM

#42835 RE: silicon valley au #42824

'silicon valley au'

I have no idea of the value of the company, past, present, or future. That can only be determined when shareholders have a chance to read the Q filings & financials within.

But right now retail shareholders feel the STOCK value is 3 cents. You have to remember the stock & company are 2 different things.
---------------------------
With exchange stocks you see this in the PE ratio and how high or low the individual companies stock PE relates to the sector PE.

Most all successful companies receive a premium for their stock. That premium is the PE figure. The stock price is 10 times or 30 times higher then the forward expected earnings, based on historical financial success.

If a company has had 10% increase in earning for the last 3 quarters. And another 15% or 10% for 5 Q's. The second company would warrant a larger premium & larger PE.

On the OTC, few companies have positive PE's, let alone positive earnings. So one should not try to evaluate the company share price vs. earnings. It's all gut feelings on the OTC. And IMO comparing or trying to compare, a company without earnings, in the same way as companies which do, is an error.

And why I don't invest on the OTC. Just can't compare financial success when there is no financial success. When a company obtains financial success, they normally do a Reverse split, raise their share price level to that of a higher exchange and move up, where they offer financials which can be invested in.

That's my opinion.