The Apologist has certainly out did himself this time. Inet is suggesting that MP was just an innocent victim of the greedy Boyz. He then fabricates a sequence of improbable events which all would have had to taken place in order to support (not prove true, mind you) his proposition.
Of course, Inet only came up with excuses for about 20% of the damaging evidence against MP.
He lacks the imaginative skills to fabricate plausible excuses for the more blatant evidence which points to MP as being one of the Boyz in the original Loch Harris scam.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
