InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dr_sinecure

08/06/07 2:01 PM

#31164 RE: tharmon51 #31160

THARMON,
I agree that the adjournment voting procedure is confusing. I urge everyone to read the "Adjournments" section of the "NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS" on page 12. Read the sentence stating "No notice, other than an announcement at the Special Meeting, is required for an adjournment" This means to me that only those holding shares and/or proxies AT THE MEETING are eligible to vote for or against an adjourment, since they will be the only ones notified of the adjournment proposal. This would appear to exclude those who voted against the proposal.

I hope that I am wrong. But we will know after the meeting won't we? If I am correct, then some of us might like to find a way to vote against any subsequent adjournments. If I am wrong, then I apologize for raising a "tempest in a teapot".

In any case, I have always enjoyed reading your posts. GLTY!
icon url

RedShoulder

08/06/07 2:39 PM

#31165 RE: tharmon51 #31160

Attn shareholders attending the meeting. If your shares are held in 'street name'; ie the broker, you cannot vote those shares at the meeting. For example, my shares are held in 'street name' by Scottrade, along with other Scottrade clients holding AMEP in their Scottrade account. My name would not appear on the list of eligible shareholders to vote; but Scottrade's name would.

Therefore if you are attending the meeting, it is advisable to vote your shares well ahead of time, regardless if a 'FOR' or an "AGAINST' vote is cast.

FYI,
...greeneyedhawk