Replies to post #8695 on Universal Express Inc fka USXP

[beeboymama]

Unbelieverable, it's impossible for the landlord to call the SEC. If the landlord did that, I think the landlord did violated the privacy law, then USXP should suiting the landlord for damage. Also in questions, why are the landlord called the SEC but not put a lienhold on the USXP' properties?
and how come the poster post that without any proves?

[virginian]

"Sorry if I seem to be a bit harsher than normal, but I'm having a much harder time understanding how someone as intelligent as you obviously are still believe anything that RA and Gunderson say.

Good luck, you really are going to need it on this one. "

jking, I dont take your posts as harsh. You have the ability to get your point across in a dignified way and that is appreciated.No name calling, no throwing it in peoples faces, no bashing of shareholders. That why I respect your posts and as to why I still believe, a couple reasons 1) I'm a shareholder (modest, but a shareholder). 2) For literally years people have told me that "NSS do not exist" "FTD's only happen once in a great while through typo's and such" , "It's always the company's fault if a company fails" .Now we are finding out that these statements are false according to the SEC. So while I have no delusions that USXP is in trouble ,I do feel that Altomare and Gunderson were not the "only" problem's associated with this mess. Did you see the newest charges against 2 individuals who caused FTD's at Overstock?