InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SPIN

01/20/04 10:37 PM

#26749 RE: TonyMcFadden #26748

you can't be serious?

first, i have consistently stated that i would not contemplate taking a position in wavx until the conclusion of the SEC investigation. never said anything about any posting embargo (as much as some might wish for that).

second, Q2 revs of $1M would not only be "meaningful" it would be historic. if i recall correctly, a Q rev # of $1M would almost equate this company's entire top line combined for somewhere around 60 Qs! if Wave did $1M in Q2, wavoids would be in full-blown euphoria. but it ain't gonna happen per today's filing which stipulates no meaningful revs "for the nest two Qs" whether that is this Q & the next, or the next Q & the one thereafter is unknown.