Cassandra are you surprised by your responses?
Start the conversation with proper communication skills.
Companies that I have talked to in past and as a curtsey or a gesture of my sincerity I identify myself with my real name (First and Last) besides it being proper etiquette to do so. It's a friendly gesture and shows you have nothing to hide therefore making that first step. Thereafter I get to know the entities to which I am speaking through a long process of communication skills I have developed that work for me. This helps with both parties to get a better feel of where you are coming from and or headed to. Although I understand your reasoning for what I consider blasting was to get immediate answers by running down a roster of quiz questions, in my opinion it is considered blasting and a defensive action especially at this juncture (Exampled by your own reaction to my one word “Blasting”). The company has been instructed by there attorneys not to say anything due to pending federal charges, which is totally understandable so I ask what did you expect?
Common responses to message board posters
I can't name one company that feels warm and fuzzy over message board posts or message board posters. Usually I have received unfavorable results by identifying my position as an IHub or any other message board poster. By getting to know the individuals through meetings or developing a relationship beforehand has proved helpful. When I do identify myself as posting on message boards it usually results in a "protected" conversation thereafter as if you were taping the conversations. Now with that said and even though I have developed a somewhat trusted relationship with CyberKey I am not getting anything from them that is not already available as public knowledge. I have been pointed in the right direction thus allowing me to get the answers I need through various means of due diligence. I do not know the ins and outs to Corp, Thin and Solutions nor do I pretend that I even have it figured out but based on the fact that the FBI has not mentioned it I find it of non-interest to me or of what is going on here. I have my set of opinions here and you have yours and this is what makes this story interesting. In the end neither one of us will have the whole thing outlined correctly and my both be completely wrong. Right now the story developing is based on hearing one side of fact with a lot of speculation and opinion.
My expectations and agenda has been clear, I own stock in CyberKey and I remain positive and hopeful to it’s future
At this point in the game the company stock is at a rock bottom. To go lower or to stop trading would be the result of a complete company shutdown. I believe CyberKey is showing evidence of avoiding this, which makes me remain hopeful and as a shareholder and see that as very positive. My desire as a shareholder is to remain hopeful, see a favorable outcome for the company and a possible return. Just an observation on my part but what is your desire here? Truth? As we both know truth is not always the outcome, which I can cite numerous criminal and civil cases as going both ways to what I saw as hard evidence for or against.
To conclude
I believe I answered both of you and Junezb sincerely and honestly when Junezb asked your same question and that was that I did not get the merger issues correct in my earlier post. Seeing that we are here as third parties looking in I can only say that getting it incorrectly would be an understandable position when missing all the facts. As you can see I'm not very much into development of what ifs, he said she said or different variations of what actually happened by making them a final conclusion without "all" the evidence. I can say that I have asked and received a simple and satisfactory answer to the above-mentioned issue that meets my curiosity in the matter. I have marked this chapter of the book as unverifiable and at this point based on lack of real and complete evidence or SEC or FBI mention I find this as an irrelevant factor. Good luck to you on your quest for justice.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
