replacing the "hy-tech three" with Coro's Spencer, Harvey, and Mandrell or Calsyn is a slate that could (and should IMO) win support of a majority of SHs IMO.
what exactly do the "hy-tech three" (Conklin, McNear, Nielsen) provide the company?
the entity that generates 95% of all revs currently has no board presence -- what is wrong with that picture?
That I'm not sure. The information on the doc I posted is "proposed rule". "so, am i to understand that someone with a 1% share in the company is able to institute a board of directors nominee"
"i think we need to identify what level of ownership this group represents"
Welcome aboard! If anything this quest will serve as an education which is a positive step regardless of the outcome.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED PERSON DISCLOSURE AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Final rule.