InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SPIN

07/25/07 8:35 AM

#8712 RE: _anonymous #8711

replacing the "hy-tech three" with Coro's Spencer, Harvey, and Mandrell or Calsyn is a slate that could (and should IMO) win support of a majority of SHs IMO.

what exactly do the "hy-tech three" (Conklin, McNear, Nielsen) provide the company?

the entity that generates 95% of all revs currently has no board presence -- what is wrong with that picture?




icon url

Arrow335

07/25/07 8:42 AM

#8713 RE: _anonymous #8711

That I'm not sure. The information on the doc I posted is "proposed rule".
"so, am i to understand that someone with a 1% share in the company is able to institute a board of directors nominee"

"i think we need to identify what level of ownership this group represents"

Welcome aboard! If anything this quest will serve as an education which is a positive step regardless of the outcome.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED PERSON DISCLOSURE
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.

http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2006/33-8732a.pdf
icon url

chunga1

07/25/07 11:23 AM

#8717 RE: _anonymous #8711

cograts on the new job...8) imo share counts are not a good idea. maybe privately but not publicly