that is the point of my proposal; if we feel strongly that coroware is where the future success of this company lies, then lets make it known. If we can organize around an initiative to institute say a hiring freeze at INRA headquarters, or push for the promotion of lloyd spencer to COO of the holding company; something that shows our intent, then i would consider it better than the empty rhetoric that is being talked about on this site... I see the systemic business model issue, and i believe i raised the point in both of my "first" posts. it is my belief that RWT and Altronics should be IP holding units, and should only be concerned with defending and acquiring IP rights, as well as collecting on outstanding licensing fees (i.e. ABB). URC is a great product, but the truth of the matter is that the aftermarket for old robots is likely being passed up in favor of buying new; the robots that the auto industry has employed are likely fully depreciated assets, and they are choosing to invest in new; as a matter of opinion, and robotics online that claimed a 28% increase in robot sales YoY. Coroware is clearly, far and away, the winner part of the company, and every effort should be made to find financing or VC dollars in order to facilitate growth; they obviously have things they want to do, hence the hiring increase, but not enough resourses due to their corporate affiliation. The reason i bought inra was specifically coroware; and for nothing else. my point, is, and has been, lets organize around this issue and show shareholder intent.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
