AF (CREDIBLE ONE) would give back some credibility to the source relative to FUTURE PR'S or NR's. Every time I refer to the AF presumably coming, I qualify it with 'WHATEVER IT SAYS' (i.e. it very well may not confirm what has been stated in the past).
I do not know how much the AF do cost. However if the delay is caused somewhat by the unavailability of the auditors as earlier mentionned by someone, the cause should not be function of the elapse time. Against that cost, one should credit the savings made by not issuing useless PR's since March 9.
Theorically, the lawsuit being a Matin's private action, one should assume that we (shareholders) are not paying for it?
'Both these have an impact on the financial being of the company'
Since we do not yet have a clue what 'the financial being of the company' realy is and considering the previous comments made here, we hereby illustrate very well that herein held debates are generally based on vaporware ... LOL
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
