Replies to post #24858 on MSB Global Capital Corp. (MSBM)

[dfall]

someone answer this please. unless im missing something here, it appears the water is no longer an issue ?

Posted by: mildtrans
In reply to: JohnIraq who wrote msg# 24853 Date:7/18/2007 3:32:01 PM
Post #of 24865

"As a result of the requirement to undertake this extensive application process, I have been informed by the Division of Oil, Gas and Minerals, that the amended Notice of Intent to Conduct Exploration by Russell Industries, Rage Claims, no longer includes the requirement to pump water from this adit."

What's your point john? Are you trying to prove you've been right on somethinhg that's not an issue anymore?

[JohnIraq]

No Mildtrans, I'm not...

just walking through the facts to show that a dewatering issue did exist, despite Mr. Bermans assertion that it didnt.

The desire to dewater an adit was included in the original NOI.

The Division of Water Quality permit application process is extensive.

The desire to dewater an adit is no longer part of the amended NOI.

Whether it returns to be an issue depends very much on what Mr. Bermans plan of action is for the Rage Claims from this point on. With a little foresight and some fundamental questions asked of the Division of Water Quality prior to the submission (late though it was) of the NOI, this issue could have been avoided entirely... but I guess $350k just doesnt buy the kind of talent it used to huh..?

Perhaps those who are a little irked by my recent posts should consider venting a little of that anguish in the direction of the individual responsible for making these decisions/statements... One Mr. Rick Berman.

Cheers, J.