InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 747
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/11/2007

Re: mildtrans post# 24858

Wednesday, 07/18/2007 11:36:35 PM

Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:36:35 PM

Post# of 44855
No Mildtrans, I'm not...

just walking through the facts to show that a dewatering issue did exist, despite Mr. Bermans assertion that it didnt.

The desire to dewater an adit was included in the original NOI.

The Division of Water Quality permit application process is extensive.

The desire to dewater an adit is no longer part of the amended NOI.

Whether it returns to be an issue depends very much on what Mr. Bermans plan of action is for the Rage Claims from this point on. With a little foresight and some fundamental questions asked of the Division of Water Quality prior to the submission (late though it was) of the NOI, this issue could have been avoided entirely... but I guess $350k just doesnt buy the kind of talent it used to huh..?

Perhaps those who are a little irked by my recent posts should consider venting a little of that anguish in the direction of the individual responsible for making these decisions/statements... One Mr. Rick Berman.

Cheers, J.


In Remembrance of Joe Bresler, former C Sqn (Rhodesia) SAS, good friend, sorely missed. RIP Joe