InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

makesumgravy

07/18/07 3:04 PM

#24854 RE: JohnIraq #24853

Thanks John,

Maybe a tanker truck can pump it out if its not that much. I notice the mill has some sort of water gorge they have created. Although I don't know what its used for?. Denison from time to time must run into similar problems?. I don't know why Berman would deny this if a problem does exist? Maybe he will address this to better clarify the situation?. There has to be some means to get the water out, maybe as you suggest maybe its run off or something of that nature?
icon url

mildtrans

07/18/07 3:32 PM

#24858 RE: JohnIraq #24853

"As a result of the requirement to undertake this extensive application process, I have been informed by the Division of Oil, Gas and Minerals, that the amended Notice of Intent to Conduct Exploration by Russell Industries, Rage Claims, no longer includes the requirement to pump water from this adit."

What's your point john? Are you trying to prove you've been right on somethinhg that's not an issue anymore?
icon url

TekNuLoof

07/18/07 5:07 PM

#24870 RE: JohnIraq #24853

With all due respect, your dd leaves alot to the imagination.

A lot of pieced together statements intermingled with your opinion without clear reference it appears to me.

Who said this?...

"As a result of the requirement to undertake this extensive application process, I have been informed by the Division of Oil, Gas and Minerals, that the amended Notice of Intent to Conduct Exploration by Russell Industries, Rage Claims, no longer includes the requirement to pump water from this adit."

What's your point here? Why did you hold this information back if you felt it was important? And, why would it be important all of a sudden to break your confidence with Mr. Berman and post this information here on a penny stock message board? Is there an agenda here?

"I have known about the fact that an adit located within the Rage Claim area was water filled since May 11th. At that time, as a courtesy to Mr. Berman I contacted him to advise him that the Division of Oil Gas and Minerals were offering that information to anybody requesting an update on Russell Industries Exploratory Permit Application. I further stated that I would not discuss this issue on the board and until yesterday I had not. I have changed my mind because the issue has been raised by others and more importantly, Mr. Berman is now denying that dewatering was ever an issue (if Makes earlier post is an accurate reflection of Mr. Bermans opinion, that Mr Berman has addressed this issue with several people and that those presenting it are wrong, he has apparently now stated that "somebody who knowingly posts a falsehood is committing a fraud"... unfortunately it seems we cannot hold Mr.Berman to that same standard as he only posts his opinons in relation to this issue to selected Board participants by e-mail, and with the safety net of a confidentiality clause... how convenient...). I contacted the Division of Oil Gas and Minerals for confirmation that Russell Industries had been formally advised of the permitting requirements and this letter was sent to me by return."

Also isn't this conjecture and YOUR opinion and how is this DD? ---
"if Makes earlier post is an accurate reflection of Mr. Bermans opinion... unfortunately it seems we cannot hold Mr.Berman to that same standard as he only posts his opinons in relation to this issue to selected Board participants by e-mail, and with the safety net of a confidentiality clause... how convenient...).

jmo,
Loofman