foreonetee, as the SP drops they will need to issue greater quantities of shares in order to maintain day to day operations. If that is the case, its mathematically logical that they will have to do another RS. However, Brad claims that he can achieve revenue prior to that - I guess we will have to wait and see...{again}
Why even mention a reverse? There has been nothing said by the company other than "NO REVERSE SPLIT". The statements as fact by naysayers does not give any credence to the statement.
When people make statements then people start discussing it as if the company has actually said it or proposed it, your giving credence to statements that have none. Shouldn't we wait until the company at least mentions something as a possibility before we start blasting the company for it?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
