InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

excel

07/17/07 10:53 AM

#60995 RE: McCloud #60994

There has been nothing said by the company other than "NO REVERSE SPLIT".

Short memory Ernie.
Before the last RS was brought to the cult they said no RS ever.

Of course after they lined up what I believe was warrants to the group that didn't RS like KDMV/NTRZ you had all kinds of support for the RS.

One only has to look at share structure to know it's coming.


icon url

m$teamworkotc

07/17/07 10:54 AM

#60996 RE: McCloud #60994

oinee,will you be the last mossback to turn out da lights?
icon url

abe51

07/17/07 11:00 AM

#60997 RE: McCloud #60994

Sounds like the staff and board of directors at RIM..

Quote Of The Day:

Whatever you do, you need courage. Whatever course you decide upon,there is always someone to tell you that you are wrong. There are always difficulties arising that tempt you to believe your critics are right.
To map out a course of action and follow it to an end requires some of the same courage that a soldier needs. Peace has its victories, but it takes brave men and women to win them.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Abe
icon url

foreontee

07/17/07 12:31 PM

#61005 RE: McCloud #60994

Actually I was replying to post 60092 who was asking Brad K when the reverse split would put us on nasdaq. Of course that is also what we were told 7 years ago the last reverse split would do for us.
icon url

WHP03

07/18/07 12:20 AM

#61046 RE: McCloud #60994

Gee - and they said no reverse split before too... and they also said revenues by year's end in .... 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007.... and to date none have hit the books from a commercially viable high-speed communications chip set. So, my hunch is - a reverse split is all but a done deal, in order to keep the game going well into Ray's later years, living the good life on the backs of shareholders.