InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

espa

07/13/07 8:30 AM

#79573 RE: fonzzz #79550

This is the answer, terrell is the big l**r


Posted by: fonzzz
In reply to: espa who wrote msg# 79541 Date:7/13/2007 7:28:38 AM
Post #of 79572

So you have confirmation of:
- PNMS does not own 20% of desimplex
- desimplex is waiting for the money.

Now check with MT if they're lying too.
icon url

causeimdaddydamnit

07/13/07 8:50 AM

#79584 RE: fonzzz #79550

Fonzz.....I don't know where you're coming from. We know that Panamersa agreed to purchase a stake in DeSimplex, that it is a long term debt, and the e-mail posted by espa seems to confirm that all is well.

Posted by: espa
In reply to: causeimdaddydamnit who wrote msg# 79480 Date:7/13/2007 7:03:30 AM
Post #of 79580

CIDD, please don't ask me more!


Answer from Desimplex!

Dear Sirs:

It does not exists a reason at this moment by which Desimplex must break relations with Panamersa, Desimplex has a contract signed with Panamersa in where Panamersa is committed to make an investment for the Desimplex expansion around the globe, at the moment in which the investment is already completed, Panamersa will obtain 20% of Desimplex. At this moment we are in stand by, waiting the investment to be completed.


Sincerely,

DESIMPLEX

icon url

KQforever

07/13/07 2:49 PM

#79788 RE: fonzzz #79550

dude. its just meaning lost in translation.

there's no lies going on. PNMS hasn't paid yet, but never said they were going to pay upfront right away. there's only one thing confirmed in the mail you're using as confirmation.....

...that YOU LIED when saying was contract was only an oral arrangement.


icon url

KQforever

07/13/07 2:53 PM

#79789 RE: fonzzz #79550

On that note, here's some reiteration of MT's position from Theresa:


Good morning ----- - nice to hear from you again.

Firstly, the PDR Exchange is not deemed flawed; any new conceptual process is going to take some time. We are barely 10 days young into it and I am aware of the loyals in this company; we appreciate all of their patience.

You may quote me directly - There is absolutely no truth to any of the statements involving Desimplex that denote any negative relationship. Period.

Any shareholder is welcome to contact me at any time; I am always available either by e-mail or phone.

Best regards,

Theresa Rogers, Director

Investor Relations





On Thu Jul 12 17:35 , '----- ----' sent:

- Hide quoted text -

Theresa,

As a loyal shareholder since the beginning, current PDR holder in a flawed system, and patient long who has attested to the company's faithfulness against naysayers... I want to ask you of the following questions:

1) Is there any truth with the accusations that Desimplex has not received proper payment from Panamersa?
2) Is it true that Panamersa has not yet bought 20% of Desimplex?
3) Is there any truth in the idea that Panamersa should not have placed a $5.4 million value next to Desimplex in their books?
4) Last of all is there any truth in the idea that the Panamersa/Desimplex relationship may falter in the near future?

Like many, I've been roughly screwed over by companies on the pink sheets before and would like to believe that this company is different as I think it is.
I write this because I feel entitled to ask the Investor Relations department for an accurate assessment that would assuage it's company's investor.
Naturally, I will not post your response unless given permission.

Sincerely,
-----