On that note, here's some reiteration of MT's position from Theresa:
Good morning ----- - nice to hear from you again.
Firstly, the PDR Exchange is not deemed flawed; any new conceptual process is going to take some time. We are barely 10 days young into it and I am aware of the loyals in this company; we appreciate all of their patience.
You may quote me directly - There is absolutely no truth to any of the statements involving Desimplex that denote any negative relationship. Period.
Any shareholder is welcome to contact me at any time; I am always available either by e-mail or phone.
Best regards,
Theresa Rogers, Director
Investor Relations
On Thu Jul 12 17:35 , '----- ----' sent:
- Hide quoted text -
Theresa,
As a loyal shareholder since the beginning, current PDR holder in a flawed system, and patient long who has attested to the company's faithfulness against naysayers... I want to ask you of the following questions:
1) Is there any truth with the accusations that Desimplex has not received proper payment from Panamersa?
2) Is it true that Panamersa has not yet bought 20% of Desimplex?
3) Is there any truth in the idea that Panamersa should not have placed a $5.4 million value next to Desimplex in their books?
4) Last of all is there any truth in the idea that the Panamersa/Desimplex relationship may falter in the near future?
Like many, I've been roughly screwed over by companies on the pink sheets before and would like to believe that this company is different as I think it is.
I write this because I feel entitled to ask the Investor Relations department for an accurate assessment that would assuage it's company's investor.
Naturally, I will not post your response unless given permission.
Sincerely,
-----