well lets see if he's accurate shall we
"That means we could lose the Youngblood well, which pales in comparison to wells on the Hart and Padgett leases in Palo Pinto Counties."
YOUNGBLOOD, M - Well # 1
09 - PARKER County
API 363-32768
field 65280200
Approved , Issued 08/10/2004
production totals Jan 1996- June 2007
Total 28,432 mcf 91 Oil 70 Condensate
Where's the loss of this well?
Compared to the Gain of these;
Total 4,073 Oil 11,807 Gas
Lease Name: HART RANCH, Lease No: 29511
Total 21,098 Oil 93,666 Gas
Lease Name: MURPHY, VIVIAN, Lease No: 30322
Look at this wells history;
Lease Name: MARQUESS, F.H., Lease No: 091655, Well No: 1
1993-1996 MITCHELL ENERGY, no production ever
1996-2000 MKS CONSULTING, no production ever
2000-2000 TELESIS OPERATING CO., INC, no production ever
2000-2004 LEXUS GAS CORPORATION, production finally
Apr 2004 2,595 Gas 55 Oil,
total production in 11 years.
2004-2007 PROCO OPERATING CO., INC., Operator No: 679595
Production to date 57,485 gas 843 Oil 775 Condensate
Proco turned this one around since they got it 3 years ago, when other reputable companies couldnt
ya know what? There's more of them babies out there just waiting their turn......
Thats called............DD
Thats what they're sitting on, thats why I'm signed on......
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
