InvestorsHub Logo

ergo sum

07/10/07 2:24 PM

#13574 RE: Ivankov #13573

I seriously doubt that.

serfdom

07/10/07 2:37 PM

#13577 RE: Ivankov #13573

So what do the lawyers have to say to all of that Ivankov?

"Evidence of this is still scant"

Are you joking? It's all in writing!

Replevin

07/10/07 5:05 PM

#13581 RE: Ivankov #13573

Ivan, by "postage" do you mean posting on this board or the postage used to deliver legal correspondence in this matter?

It truly is unfortunate that the people discussing that specific lawyer this weekend did not bring it up over the past few days until it passed their self-imposed deadline of today. I read several people who were willing to support this effort. I think they wanted more information. It wasnt provided. I look forward to discovering the identity of this lawyer. Shareholders should get involved anyway they can if they have a chance. If the shareholders are not going to sue for fraud they should attempt creditor status. I have seen poor use of your resources and time. I have also read some posts on the Ragingbull that dont seem to fit other posts here. This weekend I read posts that establish the times of communication between Paul and shareholders. Yet I have not seen an affidavit supporting Rodrigo by any shareholder. Perhaps I will see it this week. I thought I saw a promise to draft this affidavit. Perhaps I read it wrong again. Replevin

stockefeller

07/10/07 6:15 PM

#13587 RE: Ivankov #13573

"Evidence is still scant..." You've got to be joking, right?