stakddek, I think what we are seeing here is illustrative of the fact that DNAP's technology is based on leading edge basic science, and that the people associated with the company (Shriver, Chakraborty, McKeigue, etc) are key players in the field. I also think that there is a misconception about just how far ahead we potentially are when NIH funded projects that have recently begun have as their objectives results that we have ostensibly already achieved. The issue I have is why we are not recipients of NIH funding - I think part of the reason for this is a bias against industry in favor of academia, which is in some ways understandable but also unfortunate in its ramifications. I am not sure to what extent, or if, we are involved in any of these projects; but I have my own views. I personally tend towards the view that our technology is increasingly integral to a lot of these efforts. Time will tell.
OT: Very familiar with ADZR. There seems to be a bit of a push on this one lately. Of course one view is that the big rise has already taken place...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
