Mingwan0: We are forever thanking you for your unselfish efforts. So once more, a THANKS.
But a question. Could some of these grants be going to "tailriders"? As in a way they can review the DNAP work and then "using the research", repeat the methodology, or perhaps knowing the goal, approach getting the same result from a different angle?
I would secretly hope that all this "flurry" has to do with grants to allow academic endeavor while at the same time proofing out the DNAP science that has been patented. We are approaching that time when the projects are being reviewed by the FDA. Could we be seeing a sort of peer review here as the DNAP mathematics is being checked against a statistically significant sampling in a number of DNAP's target areas.
Perhaps a great deal of wishful thinking on my part, but I would surmise that DNAP would be interested in the results to "proof" our out mathematics and modeling.
Please also take a look at a company called ADZR.pk . They are involved in data gathering on an extreme level. Originally as a resource tool for I believe Internet advertising, but now the complex mathematical models they have created are being used for threat assesment in our current national defense programs. That certainly hints at a lot of very advanced data scouring and sorting capability. Wouldn't it be funny if a program used to catch terrorists could be utilized for medical research? By the way ADZR took a large jump this week and you would have to do a lot of dilligence to feel comfortable entering the stock at this price level when due dilligence would be searching for hints of government contracts and partnerships with existing large firms. Information that is not available because it is government contracts and so possibly incommunicado. Oh well, but the science here really looks promising. When you have giga-terra bits plus of data to look at, I get the feeling they have an "AI expert" that seems to do the job.
Stakddek
