Great post serf , and i beleave the snake in the grass is Ray Hawkins he is pertty savy not his first dance lol tell me he did not know about germany .
All eyes will be on the next 10Q to see just how much dilution has taken place and whether or not the company is translating revenue growth and funding into profits.
serfy, to set things straight, the COMPANY does not dictate the length of the restriction in this case. They made it clear these were rule 144 shares, and therefore are governed within those rules. Now...I will add that they did say "restricted for one year" which was extremely misleading, but not inaccurate. We all know that we as retail folk can sell after year one on a limited basis, so their comment was accurate. But...I think they stated it in such a way as to mislead peeps into thinking the shares would be free trade after that one year timeframe.
As far as the TA goes...he was a major part of the ISSUING problem.
I think the old T/A messed up big time they are sueing him as it stated in the last filing. What they get who knows.
I mean what can a company say when the SEC is doing an investigation and a chill was put on. How about the brokerages still not complying with the new T/A and not allowing buys on PAVC?
Now you have to admit looking at the recent news PAVC looks a lot better than a year ago and IMO will get better.
Posters complained about not recieving their certs or round up shares, well they are now.
IMO Bauer is doing a good job as of late. Other companies would have been gone by now IMO.
I always remember a two year restriction with a one year under the rule 144 where we are now.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
