Kron, would you please enlighten me as to XM's numbers being worse than SIRI? I appreciate your comments, and I am merely trying to learn more. I don't doubt that in some ways they are...would love to see why. The Fool article's assertions about SIRI from essentially a financial standpoint and are essentially on par with other companies that are below $5 that do not have positive cash flow. In fact, I think they rarely cover stocks that live below $5, as most are speculative, at best, and do not meet their suggested requirements for good investments. But you probably know that already, following the Fool.
Honestly, I don't know what her (the talking head) level of study is on these companies. Neither do you from what you say. I don't know why you are taking such a negative tone towards my questions or points...I am just trying to learn more about the company and competitor.
Fools are anti Sirius because it doesn't fit their prescription for success...being essentially a very small cap, and not on the +$5 list for a long time now, with a poor balance sheet. XM has jumped to nice levels in the past year, and in some ways is at least on their rating criteria.
Probably good points on the radios. But your point about Sirius needing money now is part of the concern of not only the Fools, but myself as well.
I am SIRI long. But it seems like the many supporters of this stock have a hell of a chip on their shoulder.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
