InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lrice

06/22/07 6:41 PM

#1993 RE: tonyp #1992

Tonyp, adjust your scale, 200 million gallons a year participation for USSE/SSTP and a minimum 1 dollar per gallon profit.

100 reactors x 6000 gal /day/reactor X 350 days/yr = 210 million gallons/year

and for market disruptive tech use a multiple closer to 40
icon url

grantg2

06/22/07 7:01 PM

#1994 RE: tonyp #1992

tonyp... did I say anything about

accepting Capo's numbers about PPS at any given point in time?

To talk about PPS without any revenues, contracts, PRs, and without ANY perspective about how the fickle individual investor is going to respond to a business deal in a disruptive technology is absolutely foolhardy!

BUT... that said... WHAT IF one of the deals announced is with a small country to... maybe provide up to HALF that country's power generation needs NO LATER THAN 5 years from today, and funding to start the project is in place... with the balance to be guaranteed by from revenues the first three years' production.

How would YOU say, tonyp... that the market would value that??? What would something like that drive the USSE/SSTP PPS to as a price next week, or in the next month?

YOU have any clue?
YOU think Capo or JR does?
You think anyone at the meeting in Natchez does?

I know that I have no idea where it might run to, nor do I think anyone can really say without it being nothing more that a silly wild-axx guess!

JMO...