InvestorsHub Logo

LGL8054

06/20/07 10:48 AM

#6599 RE: LGL8054 #6598

We cant blame the shorts .

charts talk

06/20/07 11:46 AM

#6609 RE: LGL8054 #6598

LG your post # 6598 is very interesting and presents several items that you may want to discuss since you posted the info.

1.Do you have any conflicts of interest?

You use the words "our web site". The following is a quote from your post, "For a complete list of companies on the naked short list please visit our web site. To find the SqueezeTrigger Price before a short squeeze starts in any stock, go to www.buyins.net" END QUOTE

2. How did all those millions of shares become no longer naked?

The following is a quote from your post. QUOTE, "With 22.55 million shares outstanding and 76,900 shares declared short as of May 2007, there is no longer a failure to deliver in shares of BDGR". END QUOTE
Note the above was June 5, 2007, AS QUOTED; "BUYINS.NET: MGEN, SNDN, UWNK, VBTC, BDGR, TAROF Have Also Been Removed From Naked Short List Today
Tuesday 06/05/2007 9:27 AM ET - M2" END QUOTE.

22.55 million shares outstanding; HUMMMMMMMM
76,900,000 naked shorts covered in such a short time;HUMMM

3. What was the motive in posting this message?

4. Do you own shares of BDGR and what is your $/sh average?

5. When did you buy or sell BDGR shares, if you did?

6. Does history indicate that short squeeze, naked covering causes a stock to GO UP; NOT DOWN? I thought it went up HUMMMM

7. Why do you talk/post to yourself? It may appear as if you are on the wrong side of BDGR, as it moves up.

8.Is item #7 (abone) correct?

9.Last question, what is the ratio of negative to positive posts you have made on this board?

Take your time to respond, but please do respond since you have been "so active on this board lately".

The more I read post like yours, the more it appears that I may have been correct to buy at $.045-.07/sh lately to $/sh average down!!!!!!!!!!!!

"WHAT SAY YOU???????????"