Keep in mind that the numbers are a snap shot from December 31, 2006 We need Share structure & 1Q07 numbers to see the real story of what will unfold in 2007 & part of 2008. The Bold & Notes are mine.
TOTAL ASSETS 125,428,066 88,474,012 Growth =========== ===========
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities 28,543,162 6,519,938 Note #2/4/13
Long Term Liabilities 4,107,000 2,343,842 Note #2/4
Shareholders' Equity Stock & Paid in Capital 84,113,032 79,610,390 Unrealized Market Gain / (Loss) (14,441) Retained Earnings (158) (158) Income / (Loss) 8,679,471 ----------- ----------- 92,777,904 79,610,232
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 125,428,066 88,474,012 Growth =========== ===========
Phoenix Associates Land Syndicate, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Expense - Pre-Audit --------------------------------------------------------- For Year Ended December 31, 2006
2006 ----------- Revenue 178,143,101
Cost of Goods Sold 159,605,335 ----------- Gross Profit 18,537,766
Income / (Loss) Pre Tax 8,679,471 Conclusions ===========
Phoenix Associates Land Syndicate, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Expense - Pre-Audit --------------------------------------------------------- For Year Ended December 31, 2005 2005 -----------
Revenue 165,971,862
Costs and Expenses Operation Costs 156,771,118 General and Administrative 2,735,642 ----------- Total Costs and Expenses 159,506,760
EBITDA 6,465,102 ===========
Notes; Note #1) Over head, new people coming in with the effect of higher costs of sales but in the reverse people that know the industry.
Note #2) 32 unit town home. Profit to exceed $10 million to be realized over the next two years. Borrowed $6.5 million, total cost $11 million (Affected Liabilities both current & long term depending on the loan structure)
Note #3) High speculations here and I will leave it at that.
Note #4) Cost $2 million with a 10 year note at 6% (Goes to long term liabilities minus what is due in 2007 which would be short term liability). The engine contract is what I would like to know more about. Hot path inspections and overhauls on turbines bring a pretty penny.
Note #5) Converted 42 million shares? Did PA & Company convert 25%? Now that would reduce the float by a substantial amount.
Note #6) $20 million contract with Cherokee that then evolved into a contract on a per year basis (Reason for the 1,700 acre new mine?). Mine went to a 24/7 operation. Five sites are now to be utilized at the mine. Announced the doubling of mine volume. Detailed specs on new equipment. Announced the acquisition of a new 1,700 acre mine (which I believe is in the County of Pearl River MS). I believe that a lot of the equipment purchased for the mine ended up on the 2006 balance sheet. Depletion increased due to mine activity. Depreciation of mining equipment; who knows what schedule of depreciation they used but my guess it is the one that takes the cost of the equipment as quickly as they can and does not represent any relationship to the useful life of the mining equipment.
Note #7) Cash; the way ProGas operates lays a lot of cash in the accounts. Increased mine production in 2006 could also account for the difference sense ProGas revenues do not look like the 190,000,000 that were stated for them before the purchase by PBLS (Katrina & Rita damage could have been very severe and some of the production that was knocked off line might not have been economical to repair). Leaves me to believe that the mine & some of the oil-services related companies where a good chunk of this.
Note #8) the majority of the difference should relate to Growth at the mine; piles of material yet to be sold. If you get new equipment on site then use it to process material into a sellable form.
Note #9) Nice growth for a Pinkie.
Note #10) Hopefully this investment is very liquid and can be used for working capital. Then again in a dream world they forked over $10 million to get a 30% equity chunk in a certain small refinery restart project that one of our IHub board members passed on to them.
Note #11) When you buy companies, the difference between the book value and the purchase price can end up there. It is a really hard to define intangible that can be confusing.
Note #12) Same as note #9
Note #13) This is an ISSUE and hopefully Note #10 relates to this. Current liabilities are due within the next year. Then again I would rack them up if Notes #2/6/10 apply and will cover. Liabilities can be good & bad depending on what they were generated for.
Conclusions: We are in for a rough ride and anyone who thought we would spike to DA’MOON will be disappointed. Others willing to sit for a few years will be very happy with this one; even a few days if the share structure is good. This looks just like any growing company would look like at this stage. I am happy with what I see in general and I am waiting for tomorrow.
They told us 815M or less when form 10 is released. I can find and repost that info. if need be. Just don't want to confuse investors about any surprises.
i will await your thought with an open mind... but as to your thinking on o/s, you need to be open to that also... I suspect we will have about 1.2 billion shares or so... not neccessarily a bad thing depends on the deals and very soon to be announced deals in my opinion... do not take a 1.2 billion share o/s as such a neg... it really could be good for growth...