InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bigfish

06/14/07 8:25 AM

#99507 RE: RUBY1100 #99498

It is amazing how a writer can write an article with fairly accurate info and slant it to be understood in a negative or spectacular manner by omitting just a couple of facts. It just goes to prove that writers sell more by presenting the negitive rather than good. This article would have come accross as very bland if the whole truth was told and that would get no attention whatsoever. The artice would have been so boring that probably only a few people would have read the complete article.
icon url

amj23

06/14/07 8:39 AM

#99510 RE: RUBY1100 #99498

CVX?XOM? it clearly is simply for rehash to bring about pressure. TO whom? Offor? that would be my guess. THe SEC has nothing, they are going after the CHrome/Offor 100k donation. is this it? appears so. Offor admitted this years ago. THe SEc surely would not go after this if they didn't have the "push" from super majors. IMO, they are the only ones that could "ask" the SEC to even look in to this. So Offor gets fined, fine him already, Oh, that's right , they have to have more documents!