InvestorsHub Logo

OriginalFred

06/11/07 8:46 AM

#3639 RE: frin90rz #3638

lhsmith, granted, Alex was the poster who complained about my posts reviewing the history of UDVE. When stock_seker censured my posts, he said that GPGD had nothing to do with UDVE. This was apparently wrong, and no one spoke up exposing the truth. Alex is the first poster who has come out and said that this stock is still connected with the principals of the UDVE scam. So I have to condemn Alex for his previous actions and commend him for exposing the truth now.

Stock_seeker is the one who actually censured my posts. He did not have to listen to Alex. My posts asked perfectly valid questions, and I have since been vindicated. Stock_seeker should have listened to me instead of censuring me.

I have to disagree that Alex is suckering me. I owned this stock just one time, and I doubled my money. I do not plan to own it again unless the company can show something concrete like a NI 43-101 report verified by a reputable company. A fake assay by a fake company like "Metallurgica de Mineras S.A." does not hold water.

Alex Chory

06/11/07 10:49 AM

#3642 RE: frin90rz #3638

Fred's not clueless about a damm thing, I read some of his


posts way back on raging bull, then I start putting the

1 + 1 together and it started to all add up,,,,,,,

simple yet effective!

fred's right on about this whole ordeal.

UDVE=GPGD all over again

,,,,,$$$$$

Alex Chory

06/11/07 12:22 PM

#3649 RE: frin90rz #3638

Ok, maybe I'm not as cool as Donald Trump....

But I am better looking....on a good
hair day.

,,,,$$$$