InvestorsHub Logo

Alex Chory

06/11/07 10:47 AM

#3641 RE: OriginalFred #3639

both you guys can think what you want.............

lhsmithnet's attitude is really raunchy currently
probably from the fact he's stuck in this
scam now, his best bet is to keep talking to RD....

he'' lead him thru it/

,,,,,$$$$$


Alex Chory

06/11/07 11:06 AM

#3643 RE: OriginalFred #3639

one more thing, forget about a NI 43-101 from RD,


hogwash..........yep!

,,,,,$$$$$

frin90rz

06/11/07 11:45 AM

#3644 RE: OriginalFred #3639

I'm not telling you to buy GPGD, I accept that you don't. I did suggest that if you wanted to do some DD you might pick up a few shares, just so you could say you were long. That's a just few buck's worth, but it's fine with me if you'd rather save your money for a cafe mocha (not a bad idea either).

This "Metallurgica de Mineras S.A." is not a fake company, it's not a company at all. From what I can tell, it's the name of a department in a university in Mexico where Mr. Rodriguez was at one time affiliated. Just think about looking for Mr. Rodriguez in a phone book. My take on the NI 43-101, for the billionth time, if it isn't clear, is that the data is real, but some of it was collected too long ago for inclusion in a 43-101.

I have been asking until I'm blue in the face for genuine discussion about GPGD. You are just repeating the same thing over and over and Alex just spews out meaningless sh*t. There is no hope, I have given up. But apparently, I'm not through raking your sh*t over the coals.

There was never a question, GPGD is UDVE. It was somewhat of a surprise to find that RD is still behind the scenes, but that is only a bad thing if you've got an axe to grind over UDVE. RD made contact with Regent, and the short-term hope lies with them. Regent is not going to produce a 43-101, they never claimed that they would. Regent is not going to buy GPGD, I wish everyone would use their brains and read what I am writing. If there is any hope for GPGD, this year say, it is that Regent will procure the legal rights to the concession, and put it along with the drill results in front of a reputable mining company, who might just pay a few bucks for it. That is the experience and expertise of Mr. Wilson.

I have every right to grind an axe over UDVE because I indirectly lost several thousand dollars on it (how much did you all lose). That is money under the bridge. Today and every day, I have a positive, forward looking attitude, that's how business gets done in this world. You have a negative axe-grinding attitude. Alex has a fool's attitude. I explore the possibilities of the future. You harp on what a scam UDVE was in the past. And Alex, well, who the hell knows what Alex is up to.

And this is *Alex*s message board, despite what you may think about stock_seeker or the web in general. There is no doubt in my mind that stock_seeker could care less what you say about UDVE. Alex is the one. From the start, he thought he could pump this stock to the moon. He failed, and rather than walk away and leave the innocent longs to sort it out for themselves, he's now turned on them. Why does he do that? I doubt he has a short position, though he may be aiming to pick up a boat load of cheap shares. But I rather think the reason he's turned against longs is because he's an amateur and he can't accept his own failure.

I am saying the same thing today that I have always said. I have always been tentative and guarded. And I am right and both of you know it. The difference between you two is this, if I'm right, Alex is an *sshole. So rather than publically admit to what he truly is, he is taking your side and pretending that you were right all along. About what, I wonder? I don't see much substance to what you write. UDVE was a scam. All pink sheets are a scam. That is what you say. But Alex continues to invest in pink sheets, don't kid yourself. This is only one way you are in danger of being suckered by Alex. My advice is, if it comes to getting advice from Alex on investing your money, stay on your toes my friend.