Replies to post #24712 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[barge]

Doma--So what features of the Full TAN do you believe will be under the exclusive control of WAVE?

[UncleverName]

Doma,

The difference is this, a FULL Tan is easily acquired in a tanning booth.

Hope this helps.

Unclever

[Doma]

Barge...........TCG/Full TAN.

As you have made no comment to the TCG/Full TAN
components & have answered with a question,i'll
take it you more or less agree & move the conversation
forward.
If Wave has "infinitely more Leverage power simply
through the licensing of the Embassy TAN",could you
point out which server component 3,4,5 gives Wave this power?
Or is it a combination of those servers?
Could you also point out how TCG server components 1,2 & 3
fail to give Wave any of this leveraging power or why Wave
cannot use the leverage provided by these trust servers
to take companies securely from managing Trusted Keys to
managing Trusted Keys & Applications?

TCG TAN........Today
1.Endorsement Key,Key loading server.
2.Attestation Credential Manager server.
3.Key Migration Manager server.

Full TAN........LaGrande/NGSCB
1,2,3
4.Device server
5.Trustlet Development server
6.Trustlet certification server.


"Unlike the Attestation faction, I don't think WAVE needs to achieve an important stake in Attestation to be successful. After all, WAVE has infinitely more LEVERAGE power simply through the licensing of the Embassy TAN. Keep in mind, that ALL the Trust Domain members of TCG will need to license an Embassy TAN, or be LOCKED out of the TCG Network! Isn't that LEVERAGE!!!!? Don't you think WAVE can come up with a business model involving the Embassy TANs without involving Attestation? Isn't WAVE fundamentally involved as a GateKeeper to the TCG Network? But being a Gatekeeper does not entitle WAVE to force other Trust Domains to use Embassy's Utility Software package ( which I believe is the hidden assumption underlying many in the Attestation faction)."