Replies to post #25845 on Alcar Chemicals Group, Inc. (fka ALCX)

[mysterymate]

Mornin' Mates!!!!
Chuck...No problem, what part gave you pause??SFTC:)
Really wasn't my intention to "challenge" anyone...there is always more than enough of that from others. Let me know if you need clarity and referencing what part...I will do my best to clear up the fog!LOL:)
Regarding the activity since my post...
25731 Good point made, appreciate your logic and deductive reasoning, really refreshing!!!;)
25858...Could it be that this is simply part of the investigation(only way to access shareholder personal infoIMO) into SAT companies(NSS, dirty shell creation, etc.), a good thing for shareholders because it means the truth will set us free from specualtion at long last???LOL:)
Jen...do yourself a favor, don't take the bait!!! This effort to draw people out and force their hand only hurts the participants. Ignore the nonsense. tfeydimd:)


Looking forward to the discussion.LOL:)

[mysterymate]

Per your request Chuck, hope this helps...I was responding to post 25701, regarding the "sell to Asia"...My points were simply these(all JMO):
The reported contract with Siam/SREG would undoubtedly contain detailed terms to protect AC, shareholders, Alcar, technologies, etc. however; it is unlikely that it would have detailed any terms to maintain a certain standard number or frequency of communications to shareholder/public via PR's/letters.
Why???? Siam doesn't care if the stock "tanks", this better serves their purpose for the "buyback" to eliminate/resolve the NSS.GFAL:)
The "secrecy" surrounding Siam...so they can go on with their plans without being investigated.JMO;)
All of my commentary was based on reasoning and I intended to itemize those reasons for comprehension purposes. SIFY:<

Slim...tx for the heads up, sorry for the challenge.tx for your DD in trying to follow, mmtyk.LOL:)

Historically my posts have been heralded as "pumping" because I choose to be positive. Accused repeatedly of being a deceitful imposter under a new assumed name, with excessively "cheerful" posting which contains only "assumptions, conjecture, nothing factual,lots of LOL,etc."; therefore, I was making a concentrated effort to tone down my "cheer" and lean toward practicality and deductive thinking. Of course, this is still all speculative; however, more accepted and I do try to please everyone.LOL:)

Here's hoping we having a GREEN day!!!LOL:)