Per your request Chuck, hope this helps...I was responding to post 25701, regarding the "sell to Asia"...My points were simply these(all JMO):
The reported contract with Siam/SREG would undoubtedly contain detailed terms to protect AC, shareholders, Alcar, technologies, etc. however; it is unlikely that it would have detailed any terms to maintain a certain standard number or frequency of communications to shareholder/public via PR's/letters.
Why???? Siam doesn't care if the stock "tanks", this better serves their purpose for the "buyback" to eliminate/resolve the NSS.GFAL:)
The "secrecy" surrounding Siam...so they can go on with their plans without being investigated.JMO;)
All of my commentary was based on reasoning and I intended to itemize those reasons for comprehension purposes. SIFY:<
Slim...tx for the heads up, sorry for the challenge.tx for your DD in trying to follow, mmtyk.LOL:)
Historically my posts have been heralded as "pumping" because I choose to be positive. Accused repeatedly of being a deceitful imposter under a new assumed name, with excessively "cheerful" posting which contains only "assumptions, conjecture, nothing factual,lots of LOL,etc."; therefore, I was making a concentrated effort to tone down my "cheer" and lean toward practicality and deductive thinking. Of course, this is still all speculative; however, more accepted and I do try to please everyone.LOL:)
Here's hoping we having a GREEN day!!!LOL:)
Forever trust in who we are...and nothing else matters, life is ours we live it our way...all these words I don't just say.
There's much more to life than what you see...every day for us something new...open mind for a different view.