InvestorsHub Logo
Replies to #46975 on Biotech Values
icon url

DewDiligence

05/19/07 3:36 PM

#46976 RE: bobrmd #46975

>…with the side effects of gemzar you have a hard time convincing me that it is of any great benefit<

You are contradicting yourself. If taking chemotherapy is an awful thing—as you assert—then surely delaying the need for additional chemo, which Gemzar did handily in the pivotal ovarian trial—is a meaningful QoL benefit.
icon url

DewDiligence

05/19/07 3:48 PM

#46977 RE: bobrmd #46975

>The fda should cut dendreon some slack because if it really does improve survival by 23% that would be remarkable…<

If it really does? You do not sound especially confident here.

>…and a shame that patients are now deprived of that chance.<

This is an investment forum. If you want to help cancer patients, there are many worthy charitable organizations who would gladly accept your donation. Regards, Dew
icon url

onco

05/19/07 4:06 PM

#46981 RE: bobrmd #46975

you do not sound like an oncologist to me. what do you treat them with little buddy?
icon url

poorgradstudent

05/19/07 4:15 PM

#46986 RE: bobrmd #46975

>If you think that pfs for gemzar is significant then you cant see the forrest through the trees<

The HR was 0.72. You frequently refer to the median numbers, and in that metric, it was 8.6 months for the gemzar / carbo arm versus 5.8 months for the carbo arm, or a gain of 2.8 months.

Not really sure what your gripe is with Gemzar.