The January 2007 decision was that of a bankruptcy court in mississippi. That decision needed to be appealed --- not file a new action in california. Hopefully, this suit is primarily aimed at the entity that sold the assignment of the stonewall note to cbay for fraud. Unfortunately, cbay took that phony assignment and note without recourse which means cbay ain't going to get a dime. Why wasn't Pawson sued? The cbay lawyer for malpractice?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
