InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

deldestino

05/08/07 4:25 PM

#37510 RE: momentumtrader #37509

momeentrader

explain a situation on how the shorts will get squeezed to death and how it will affect the share price so we as shareholders can be rewarded. How many shares would a shareholder need to retire if this were to occur? Please give a few examples.


thanks
icon url

Time To Roll

05/08/07 4:27 PM

#37511 RE: momentumtrader #37509

BTW, it did close at .017, I agree with everything else you put up. I don't understand this trading on great news.

icon url

teomax

05/08/07 6:26 PM

#37517 RE: momentumtrader #37509

as i wrote here few months ago, todays and yesterdays action confirms it again:
"....It takes always at least 10 milions buys to move it for one 0.001 up, so the whole movement from 0.02 to 0.03 will take probably some time (if there wont be some great shocking news)
On the other side, it goes down really easily, eg. this january, movement from 0.02 back to 0.01 was accomplished by low volume sells or last summer with stock buyback it went down from 0.03 to 0.02 on low volume too.
PBLS goes down mainly by small volume of sells and goes up mainly by big volume of buys"

I would really like to see PBLS buying whole float before release AF and move to higher exchange, since they can sell it later back to the market for much higher price and make bigger profit then they make from their operations in a year.






icon url

still wet Bhind ears

05/09/07 12:01 AM

#37524 RE: momentumtrader #37509

I know a lot of you guys aren't buying the naked short theory yet but "SOON" I think you will have to narrow it down and convince yourselves that it is not all that far fetched.

At first I wasn't sure either. I watched as good news was released and the pps started up but quickly returned to it's starting position or went even lower.I remember the MN1 radio show. After a dismal beginning PA finished strong and you could literally watch the trades coming in hard. The pps went up immediatly but then as if the hedgefunds had it on alert it began to plummet. Notice any connection to todays action?

One might entertain the thought that the company could be selling into the runs but what will one say (on or before June 15th)when transparency rears it's beautiful head and one sees the OS is where we were told it would be?
Those who love nothing more than to read their own posts may have to create new ways to defer attention from the evergrowing possibilty of fails to deliver here.

I am not a conspiracy theorist by any means but I have to call them like I see them. The SEC has flat out admitted that fails to deliver exist and they are not sure what to do about them. This stock has seemingly been under attack for quite some time and it looks as if whomever is shorting it doesn't care what the company does. Momentumtrader appears to be a smart cookie and has a good feel for what is going on here with the shorts. Some here might want to read a little deeper into his posts.

Naked shorters rely on endurance. They count on outlasting the shareholders. They are very aware that most traders will give in to long periods of low pps and then sell at a loss. They know most of us will give up and move on to other stocks because they are used to dealing with flippers and the scam companies they feed off of. I don't think they know how many here will take their cert's to the grave. I find it a great asset that many here are REAL longs.

It's like a poker game. If the shorts can keep their game face on and bluff us out of our shares by keeping the pps down (via selling false shares into the market and hiring planted articulate negative posters to create negative sentiment). Then most unstable investors will tuck tail and run. However, should the company hold up their end of the bargain, by providing the investor their legitimacy through full disclosure. Then you and I will have to call their bluff and hold till death do we part.

The shorts count on the fact that the shareholders can't stick together and agree on even one small topic let alone a good challenge. This is exampled through some of our shareholders questioning misspelled words on the seemingly quickly thrown together power point presentation which I personally thought did us justice.

No war or game has ever been won by an indecisive split team or entity.
Those on the boards who lend only their well thought out advice like a broken record only add to the confusion of our unity and strength.

I have a lot of my own money tied up in this stock but it is not me I'm worried about. Just think if these cancerous short selling jerks are allowed to continue these activities unregulated.

I don't care who you are ( very rich or very poor ) our children will eventually be affected by the outcome of this corruptness. If these Naked short selling acts are tolerated and allowed to continue then the law of average will apply. Things will even out in the end. My children will be used to poverty and making do but I'm not sure that Paris Hilton's children will be ready for it.

Life is a delicate balance gentlemen. I do not desire the possible riches PBLS could bring me so that I may have control over others. I do however desire the freedoms that the extra money could bring me so that I might see this once great country as it was when my forefathers seen it.

Still Wet