InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

57tbird

05/03/07 7:36 AM

#5441 RE: marsnvest #5430

Ed, I'd suggest you ask your own attorney what is at stake. Then feel free to send me any new-found suggestions as a result of your conversation.

If anyone thinks Lanza is going to expose his operations to anyone outside of his family, they are in LA LA land (and I don't mean Louisiana or Los Angeles).

Lanza is completely transparent. No other way to say it. Anything he does, he does for himself. He knows no other way.

Of course I wish only the best for Lou. Unfortunately, the most Honest people are the most easily duped by those who are adept at it. Like the rest of us I was completely duped by Lanza and Michael. I can't imagine anything or anyone that could alter Lanza's behavior.

Let me know what your attorney says.

Happy Thursday!
icon url

marsnvest

05/03/07 8:48 AM

#5447 RE: marsnvest #5430

T-Bird, in reply to your first point, CT knows what is at stake and my comment was in relation to his ability to handle that. In reply to the second point, we will now find out how much exposure there will be. I will not speculate at this juncture. Third point, that is your opinion, you obviously know him better than I do. Fourth point, it seems to me to be a contradiction, wishing the best for Lou and then stating that you think he cannot succeed.

Securities law cases are very difficult to prosecute, most end up as plea bargains and at this level(pink sheets), it gets even murkier. CT has researched this and probably has the best options known at this time. I think that Lou, being on the board, will give us all a resolution to BDGR( good or bad). I frankly do not know how it will turn out, but Lou obtaining more information is not detrimental to a resolution.