InvestorsHub Logo

op9171787

04/12/07 6:05 PM

#5245 RE: The_Pink_Lawyer #5240

Pink, you need to go by the last known numbers from the DAILY LIST from OCTOBER, 2005 as the last known legal O/S. hopefully it is still valid.
imho

Chas56789

04/12/07 6:15 PM

#5248 RE: The_Pink_Lawyer #5240

The is just my Opinion. But those LSMJ shareholders who have the extra cash should ask for 1 million of their shares in certificate form. Remember there are only 20 mil in the real A/S and 14 mil in the O/S . If 20 or so people who have the extra cash does this then it would force the brokers to buy the real shares of LSMJ. This should have a positive effect on the PPS.

This is only my opinion and do what is best for yourself !

JMHO
Chas56789

uranium-pinto-beans

04/12/07 7:55 PM

#5261 RE: The_Pink_Lawyer #5240

Nice post Pink Lawyer.

Thus, the legal effectual number should be 20 million authorized shares. Nonetheless, hundreds of millions of shares have been traded over the past several weeks. This is a situation where there appears to be a huge short number of shares, that must be covered. In other words, a short squeeze play.


What are the odds of the shares ever getting covered? When I saw UBSS sitting on the ask at $.0012 today for the tune of some 75 million shares and what seemed 30 -45 minutes I thought to myself what if their is more shorting going on. Who is truly going to stop this from happening. Will these shares ever have to be bought back for anything more than $.0001?

op9171787

04/12/07 8:44 PM

#5264 RE: The_Pink_Lawyer #5240

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_detail.asp?mkt_ctg=NON-OTCBB&d=10/12/2005
The O/S changed as of Oct. 13, 2005 - look at the link for the 'XXYS' to 'LSMJ' change - scroll down a bit.
The reverse split was recognized by the NASD, and if that is in fact true, then it is entirely possible that now the A/S and O/S for LSMJ are LOWER by a factor of 1000. That is huge.
more dd needed.
imho

BIG BALLER

04/12/07 9:21 PM

#5266 RE: The_Pink_Lawyer #5240

Yo pink! Check the facts boss!


>I spoke with Gloria this afternoon and according to her there is no connection whatsoever between XXsys and Lease Smart.

>She said whatever information linking the two companies(symbols) together is incorrect.

>I asked, what is the symbol for her company and she said: XXsys!

>so after I got off the phone I checked TDA's site and Yahoo and there was no such symbol!

>saying LSMJ has 20million shares can't be correct. They are two separate entities per Gloria.

>Also, per the state of california (call yourself) there are no securities registered for Lease Smart.

...However, they do have XXsys in the database from back in the 1990's.

So my point is LSMJ is a complete mystery. Nobody seems to know where or if the shares are registered in any state, or how many shares(real or fraudulent)exist.

One thing we do know is LSMJ has the same address(10151 University Blvd Suite 120)as BHUB per State of California website. So it's possible that the same individuals were involved in both cases.

~JMO!~


p.s. thanks for the trading tips, I finally made some money on BHUB!...never drank the kool-aid just rinsed it around in my mouth for a minute!*LOL*

~GOOD LOOKING OUT!!!~

$$$*~{8^))>$$$



*peace*


Mojocash

04/12/07 10:28 PM

#5279 RE: The_Pink_Lawyer #5240

pink- are you saying there is NO connection between ismj and bhub ?

was WALL STREET KID

04/12/07 10:29 PM

#5281 RE: The_Pink_Lawyer #5240

It's as simple as that Pink_Lawyer "binding legal documents", I like that !