InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

grantg2

04/06/07 3:24 PM

#16047 RE: bleonard #16044

bleonard... we were mostly civilized before your

dipstick ASSociates at MN1 got carried away with themselves and behaved over the top and tanked about 30-40% of the PPS here. Small wonder there is no humor in Hubville this holiday!

Any animosity toward MN1 is rightfully deserved... if you think not... then you must not be able to see "fat rich!" (Rolling my eyes!) He is an obvious dirtbag disgrace to journalism! (Mouth curling in a sarcastic sneer!) His attacks on Dr. C and ACMG should bring a lawsuit against your whole organization for ACTUAL damages suffered this past week by ALL LONGS in the aftermath!

YOU may well be reputable, as I believe Bethany to be... but you are affiliated with dreg broadcasters with NO ethical standard of conduct! PERIOD.

I for one will NEVER EVER listen to MN1 again... and will tell all who will listen to me that MN1 is a front for scams and trashes the truth! Whatever suits the zit on screen; facts being irrelevant! No DD is required of the talking head in front of the cameras! It is from the hip and anything goes that sells! The more chaos and disinformation, the merrier... and once disinformation is known to exist... NO effort is made to CORRECT errors stated on air previously. MN1 never apologizes or acknowledges poorly researched diatribes... ON AIR!

How many go to read your website, rather than just look at the talking monkey/monkies?

I would not wish a bad Easter/Passover on anyone, but I would not wish an interview on MN1 on anyone either!

GLTY... find a real business broadcasting job!

JMO...







icon url

Sentinel

04/06/07 3:30 PM

#16048 RE: bleonard #16044

Bob...If your company chooses to put its worst face forward, so be it. It's a sad thing. I might believe that Doctor C may get a fair shake with you interviewing, but if I were ACMG, I certainly wouldn't take the chance. My advice to them (as well as your executive producers) would be, and has been, procure the transcripts over the last few days and decide whether this has truly been calm, clear, unbiased, "News you can trust". In my mind, it has bar far, far below that particular bar. And of course there is argument and debate here over the topic. This is a board with diverse views, and all are welcome here (those who don't welcome them see there posts stating so disappear fairly quickly).