Replies to post #52754 on e.Digital Corporation (fka EDIG)

[gernb1]

Of course Cassie you also called and confirmed this....


How to explain this ahhhh "misunderstanding" shall we call it?

Posted by: Cassandra
In reply to: gernb1 who wrote msg# 43719

Date: 8/29/2003 1:27:41 PM
Post #
GMT Capital closed out their position on EDIG.
I just spoke to Mr. Geiger at [phone]. He said it was an older position that they no longer hold.
http://www.nubridges.com/investors.htm#GMT

And today we see...

E DIGITAL CORP OTCBB
Institutional Holdings Description / Hide Summary

Company Details
Total Shares Out Standing (millions): 155
Market Capitalization ($ millions): $82
Institutional Ownership: 0.1%
Price (as of 11/13/2003) 0.53
Ownership Analysis # Of Holders Shares
Total Shares Held: 6 137,200
New Positions: 1 100
Increased Positions: 2 1,600
Decreased Positions: 1 200
Holders With Activity: 3 1,800
Sold Out Positions: 1 200

Date Shares Held Change (Shares) % Change (Shares) Value ($1000)


GMT CAPITAL CORP 9/30/2003 109,600 1,500 1.39% $58
HARTLINE INVESTMENT ... 9/30/2003 19,000 0 0.00% $10
RBF LLC 9/30/2002 5,000 0 0.00% $3
BABSON DAVID L & CO ... 9/30/2003 3,500 0 0.00% $2
WELLS FARGO & CO/MN 9/30/2003 100 100 New $0

On it's face this would appear to be a bald-faced lie ...in fact they added to their position slightly...some need to be careful what they post methinks...

and so you would understand why we would treat your posts with more than a little suspicion....no offense

[CAL_LAW]

IMO you lack forightness and truthfulness.
He said that he did not ever and would not ever confirm/deny availability - that was NOT his function. He takes orders. He did confirm that orders (many) were being taken and the orders were and would be filled as product was available. Today, tomorrow or whenever. He did NOT say that there was a delay nor did he deny it. He would not. He simply did not say anything about availability other than orders would be filled as soon as product was available to fill them (ie., the next day or ?? whenever they had product to ship) and he knew NOTHING about availability at individual stores (something he admitted he had no information about - any why would an online order taker have knowledge of stock at any of the stores?). You posted his name, IMO, just to give your false post an aire of credibility (and as it turns out, IMO, undue and false credibility) and I believe that it is important for everyone to know that you, IMHO, have no credibility and simply makeup facts to fit your predetermined scheme.
We know who and what you are and we will continue to expose your blatant and obvious, IMHO, flim flam as often as time permits.

[CAL_LAW]

Both- he categorically denied your assertive posts and otherwise refused to confirm/deny the balance. Is that so hard to understand? It should not be, especially, since, IMO you simply made up the post anyway.

[sricket]

Cassandra, could you please tell us about the
baggage handler again?